An importance of studying the problem of monocities is defined by the fact that such cities are a special form of territorial organization of regional economic systems. Lack of diverse production mono-sectoral character of development of a town is a widespread phenomenon that is typical for different countries and causes a number of negative consequences. Among those are: dependence of population on local authorities, the holder of enterprise that forms a town; uniform professional structure of population; low social mobility of residents. Obviously, a closure of the main enterprise can lead to the collapse of the whole city. According to the data of independent scientific-educational fund «Expert institute», in Russia 332 settlements of town type and 467 towns can be referred to the number of mono-profile objects. We can conclude that here we speak of 25 % of the whole urban population of the country that equals 24,5 millions of people and 49 % of gross regional product of Russian Federation.
New solutions in field of social policy in terms of monocities are necessary. First of all, we speak of modernization of a mechanism of interaction between different subjects: federal center, regional authorities, local self-government, corporations, institutions of civil society. At the national level a state policy on monocities, corresponding long-term federal target programme, macro-tools, aimed for improvement in regional investment climate must be developed. Regions ought to form action plans on preserving and developing specific mono-profile cities and define a complex of regional preferences. Local authorities are obliged to realize corresponding anti-crisis programmes with all necessary attraction of enterprises that form towns, and their strategies must imply tools to minimize possible social threats.