Scientific journal
European Journal of Natural History
ISSN 2073-4972
ИФ РИНЦ = 0,372


Musikhina O.M., Musikhina E.A.

Caring about nature is a motto of the modern world. The most significant events under such logo are meetings, protests, and attempts to recover from already done mistakes. At the same time, one should not forget about preventing the environmental degradation under human activity. Sometimes damage caused to the nature is not clearly seen or is not significant itself; however, accumulating, even small environmental damages may result in a huge problem.

Mankind regularly affects the environment by building houses, factories, roads, communications, etc. And before building, it carries out engineering surveys. During those surveys wells are drilled and rock samples are taken, which damages so-called geological environment. Thus, even if a piece of land appeared to be not appropriate for building, environment is already breached. For example, during the projecting of trans-Siberian oil pipeline the surveys, to be exact, deforesting was already started before the project was approved. Later, the project was changed under the society pressure, but what about deforested lands?

It is understandable, that we can´t refuse from building at all, but we can try to minimize damage that is caused to our planet. An alternative for standard methods of engineering survey are geophysical ones. Geophysics studies physical properties of rocks, such as elastic waves speed, specific electrical resistance, radioactivity, etc. In this case surveys may be carried out not only in wells, but on the surface. For those purposes the surface of the area is laid out with profiles and pickets, and then a recipient and a source of a certain kind of signal is set up. In such method as seismic prospecting a source lets out elastic waves (due to a shock or ultrasound), which go through rocks and reach a recipient in a certain time. Basing on the data from seismic recipient a time section of the area is plotted and then it is mathematically transformed into depth section. Later, a specialist-interpreter reforms depth section into geological one. The more experienced such specialist, the more precise his forecast about geological structure and physical properties of rocks for the area, and on the base of this particular forecast a decision about building is made.

The word "forecast" is not used occasionally here. A problem to define geological structure and physical properties of rocks on the base of geophysical data is called forecasting because in this case we can´t see what´s under our feet in real. However, using standard methods there are no 100% guarantee in precision as well, otherwise it is required to dig out all area´s surface.

Back to geophysical methods, it´s appeared that to solve the problem of forecasting effectively enough, it is required to know values of two rock properties [1, 2]: elastic waves speed and density. The last one may be evaluated by different methods (e.g. density gamma-method or laboratory measures, in which case comparatively less amount of samples is required).

Researches showed that the forecast based on those two properties matches real geological structure of the area not less than 80%, which indicates the efficiency and perspectivity of such approach. This forecast became possible due to such method of intellectual systems as expert systems, which are systems based on knowledge of experts in a certain subject. Knowledge in those systems are represented according to specific models. In the described experiment a rule-oriented model was applied, when knowledge is represented as a set of rules "if-then" [1, 2].

Applying expert systems is caused by the fact that knowledge and experience of a specialist-interpreter play the major role, as it was already told before. Expert systems allow to accumulate and to use the experience of specialists in engineering geology and geophysics instead of starting from the scratch when expert is substituted with a young specialist, who has no practical experience yet. In this case experimental expert system is able to play its role of interpreter on 80%.

It is necessary to note that the precision of 80% is not a limit so far. In the future it is necessary to carry out further researches, and first of all, it is necessary to make a detailed rocks classifier based on two properties: elastic waves speed and density. It is possible that one more property - specific electrical resistance - should be used, because electrical prospecting is one of the most popular geophysical methods, as well as seismic prospecting. As to the rocks classifier, it will be a value itself, because it will unite the knowledge of engineering geologists and geophysicists for one purpose - to protect the nature. Such engineering survey will reduce the damage caused to the environment by human activity.


  1. Musikhina O.M. Applying expert systems for forecasting the top slice of geological cut // Materials of VIII Russian School "Mathematical modeling and information technologies: controlling, artificial intelligence, applied software and programming technologies". Irkutsk, Russia, 2006. P. 118-122.
  2. Musikhina O.M. Forecasting the top slice of geological cut based on geophysical data with intellectual systems // Intellectual systems: Materials of VIII International Symposia. Moscow, Russia, 2008. P. 622-625.

The work was submitted to international scientific conference «Computer Simulation in Science and Technology», UAE (Dubai), October 16-23, 2009. Came to the Editor´s Office on 31.08.2009.