Scientific journal
European Journal of Natural History
ISSN 2073-4972

THE VALVE OPENING CONTROL TIME CALCULATION

Turkin A.A. 1 Sibirina T.F. 1 Tzuglenok N.V. 1
1 The Krasnoyarsk State Agricultural University
1. Ovodov V.S. The Agricultural Water Supply and Flooding / The Teaching Aid. – M.: Kolos. 2004.
2. Ovcharenko E.Kh. The Hydraulic Phenomena Modeling on Hydro–Technical Structures / E.Kh. Ovcharenko, A.E. Tichshenko // The Teaching Aid. – Novocherkassk, 2002.
3. The Experimental Filtration Works / Under the editorship of V.M. Shestakov and D.N. Bashkatov // The Teaching Aid. – M.: The Subsoil, 2004.
4. Plotnikov N.A. The Assessment of Underground Resources // The Teaching Aid. – М.: Gosgeologtehizdat, 1999.
5. Turkin A.A. The Physical and Mechanical Properties of Sand Particles, Contaminating Wells / A.A. Turkin, S.K. Manasyan // The Supplement to the Bulletin. – The KrasSAgU, 2004. – Р. 72–74.
6. Sibirina T.F. The Hydraulics and Hydrology. The Laboratory Workshop. The KrasSAgU / T.F. Sibirina, A.A. Turkin / The Methodical Manual. – The Achinsk Branch of the KrasSAgU. – Achinsk, 2005. –Р. 42.
7. Turkin A.A. The Artificial Gravel Filter // The Supplement to the Bulletin. – The KrasSAgU, 2005. – Р. 138–140.

Having neglected the membrane mass with the rod and the locking – regulatory body, at moving up, the shut – off and regulating body for the Δh motion, is described by the following equation [1]:

Eqn9.wmf (1)

where: ωСdh – the volume part of the over – membrane chamber with the dh height, having filled with the water during dt; μVL, ωVL – the flow rate coefficient and the inlet section of the calibrated hole; μSL(h), ωSL – the flow rate coefficient and the input section of the branch hole; НС – the head in the over – membrane chamber; Н = НIN – Нс – the head outflow through the calibrated hole; НIN – the head at the inlet of the calibrated hole.

Since the system dynamics is studied at the slight movement of the locking – regulatory body (Δh), then in order to be simplified, we linearize the non – linear equation (1). For the linearization, we’ll introduce the variables deviation from the non – initial values. So, we’ll denote:

h = ho + Δh; H = Ho + ΔH.

So, the non – linear function

Eqn10.wmf

we present in the following form:

Eqn11.wmf (2)

where D (Δh; ΔH) – is the non – linear one, having contained the Δh and ΔH product and their degrees, which are over the first one. Because of the small deviation values Δh and ΔH, the non – linear part of the series can be neglected, and, thus, to be replaced the non – linear function by its linear approximation:

Eqn12.wmf (3)

Having given, that Q (h0; Н0) is equal to Eqn13.wmf and substituted (3) into (1), we’ll yield the following:

Eqn14.wmf (4)

Having given, that

Eqn15.wmf

we’ll yield the following:

Eqn16.wmf (5)

So, the resulting equation of the transient regime (e.g. the dynamics) in the coordinates’ increments, we’ll give the dimensionless form, by means of the h and H relative deviations introducing:

Eqn17.wmf

Eqn18.wmf (6)

where hН and НН – are some constant baseline values of the water level and the moving (in our case, the head in the over – membrane chamber).

Having substituted the Δh and ΔH values, we’ll get the following:

Eqn19.wmf (7)

For the dimensionless receiving of all the equation terms, we’ll divide it by the coefficient хIN and then, having taken the Laplace transforms (e.g. the entries in the pictures, or in the operator form), we’ll obtain the dynamics equation, in the following form:

(Т⋅р – 1) хINPUT = КхOUT, (8)

where Eqn20.wmf – the time constant, having obtained from the equation (7), by means of dividing by the coefficient at хINPUT;

Eqn21.wmf – is the transfer coefficient;

р – the symbol (e.g. the operator) of the differentiation.

The characteristic equation of the equation (8) will have the following form:

Т⋅р – l = 0, (9)

whence

Eqn22.wmf (10)

Eqn23.wmf

Thus, from the equation (10), it is clear, that the check valve operation will be stable, if р has the negative real part. So, the time constant Т, in this case, must be the negative one, i.e. the denominator Eqn24.wmf will be less than zero, in other words, it is presented itself the decreasing function.

Indeed, at the h increase, the flow rate through the calibrated hole is decreased. Thus, here, there is always observed the Eqn25.wmf inequality.

The work is submitted to the International Scientific Conference «Actual problems of science and education», France (Marseilles), June, 2-9, 2013, came to the editorial office оn 29.04.2013.